AW: Intel Core i9-9900KS: Tschechischer Händler listet CPU inklusive Preis
Ich rede auch die ganze Zeit davon, kp was der sich da zusammenreimt...
Hier mal noch paar Fakten, die ich dir aufzeigen möchte Casurin:
"By Intel’s own definitions, the TDP is an indicator of the cooling performance required for a processor to maintain its base frequency. In this case, if a user can only cool 95W, they can expect to realistically get only 3.6 GHz on a shiny new Core i9-9900K. That magic TDP value does not take into account any turbo values, even if the all-core turbo (such as 4.7 GHz in this case) is way above that 95W rating. In order to make sense of this, Intel uses a series of variables called Power Levels: PL1, PL2, and PL3."
"In this case, for the new 9th Generation Core processors, Intel has set the PL2 value to 210W. This is essentially the power required to hit the peak turbo on all cores, such as 4.7 GHz on the eight-core Core i9-9900K. So users can completely forget the 95W TDP when it comes to cooling. If a user wants those peak frequencies, it’s time to invest in something capable and serious. Focusing on the new Intel CPUs we have tested, both of them go beyond the TDP value, but do not hit PL2. At this level, the CPU is running all cores and threads at the all-core turbo frequency. Both 168.48W for the i9-9900K and 124.27W for the i7=9700K is far and above that ‘TDP’ rating noted above.
Comparing to the other two ‘95W’ processors, we can see that the Core i9-9900K pushes more power as more cores are loaded. Despite Intel officially giving all three the same TDP at 95W, and the same PL2 at 210W, there are clear differences due to the fixed turbo tables embedded in each BIOS.
So is TDP Pointless? Yes, But There is a Solution
If you believe that TDP is the peak power draw of the processor under default scenarios, then yes, TDP is pointless, and technically it has been for generations."
Kannst dir dann mal das Fazit durchlesen
Conclusion: Shy Of The Very Best, Overall Absolute Winner - The AMD 3rd Gen Ryzen Deep Dive Review: 3700X and 3900X Raising The Bar
Hier ganz unten siehst du den simulierten 9900KS
Vergleichen wir das mal mit dem 12 Kern AMD Behemot 3900X, wie wir sehen, verbraucht der soviel wie der stock 9900k.
Mal sehen wie es von der Performance her aussieht bei diesem Verbrauch:
Ach schau her, der 3900X ist ja knapp 40% schneller @ stock bei selbem Verbrauch, aber man kann den 9900k ja übertakten...
Ach was sehen wir denn da? Der 9900k @ 5GHz verbraucht ja nur saftige 55% mehr als der stock 3900X und ist dabei noch satte 26% langsamer, schade aber auch
